Greenberg Traurig Shareholders Reena Bajowala and David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice, will present the MyLawCLE and Federal Bar Association webinar, “Artificial Intelligence and Data Privacy: The current (and often hidden) United States and European framework for regulating AI,” Wednesday, Oct. 4 at 11 a.m. CT.
Not necessarily.
Under the GDPR, controllers are required to provide information relating to what personal data they process, and how that processing takes place.
If the personal data the organization includes in AI prompts has been collected directly from individuals, those individuals should be provided with a copy of the organization’s privacy notice “at the
Under the GDPR, controllers are required to provide individuals with information relating to what personal data is processed, and how that processing takes place. Some supervisory authorities have specifically taken the position that organizations which use personal data to train an artificial intelligence (AI) must draft and publish a privacy notice that provides “data subjects
Data is typically needed to train and fine-tune modern artificial intelligence (AI) models. AI can use data—including personal information—to recognize patterns and predict results.
The GDPR permits controllers to process personal information if one (or more) of the following six lawful processing purposes applies:[1]
Probably not.
Under the European GDPR, if the personal information that an organization is going to use as part of training an AI has been collected directly from individuals, then those individuals should be provided with a copy of the organization’s privacy notice “at the time when personal data are obtained.”[1] If the personal
Attorneys familiar with the European GDPR are acquainted with the bifurcation of the world into controllers and processors. For purposes of European data privacy, a “controller” refers to a company that either jointly or alone “determines the purposes and means” of how personal data will be processed.[1] A “processor” refers to a company (or
Greenberg Traurig Shareholder David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the U.S. Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, will be a panelist during the webinar, “Intersection of Privacy Laws and AI,” Wednesday, Aug. 16 at 12:00 p.m. CT. The webinar will feature privacy professionals exploring the complexities presented by artificial intelligence.
Topics include:
Please join members of Greenberg Traurig’s Data Privacy & Cybersecurity team for a 1-hour, CLE-eligible webinar “The New EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework: What You Need to Know and Practical Considerations” Aug. 15 from 12 – 1 p.m. ET.
On July 10, 2023, after years of negotiations between the European Commission and the U.S. government, the
The right of correction (sometimes called the “right of rectification”) refers to a person’s ability to request that a company fix any inaccuracies in the personal data it holds about them.[1] Correction is sometimes referred to as an absolute right in the context of the GDPR, because unlike some other rights conferred by the
Under the GDPR controllers are required to provide information relating to what personal information they process, and how that processing takes place.[1] Data is typically needed to train and fine-tune modern artificial intelligence models. If that training data contains personal information, an organization is required to include a description of that processing in its