Six months after the SEC’s Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Rule (SEC Rule) came into force, an April 2024 GT Alert summarized disclosure trends. The GT Alert identified that the companies who filed a mandatory form 8-K disclosing a cybersecurity incident had erred on the side of caution, hedged on whether the materiality threshold had been met or outright stated that it had not, reported an incident early, and provided only high-level information about the incident.

The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued clarifying guidance on May 21, 2024, noting that companies were filing materiality disclosures under new Item 1.05 for incidents that did not rise to the level of a material adverse event. In other words, companies possibly afraid of being second-guessed were opting to report under Item 1.05 even when they determined that the cybersecurity incident did not have a material adverse event. The SEC’s guidance clarified that new Item 1.05 was only appropriate for cybersecurity incidents that had a material effect on the company and suggested companies could avail themselves of voluntary disclosure under Item 8.01 instead.

As a potential result of the May guidance, companies are increasingly filing non-material cyber incident disclosures under Item 8.01 of Form 8-K, while material incidents continue to be reported under Item 1.05. Since April 2024, 41 companies have filed a form 8-K to disclose a new cybersecurity incident, but 26 did so under 8.01 and 15 did so under 1.05.1 Additionally, companies are providing more detailed disclosures about affected systems and data, but amended filings often lack clarity on when additional information was discovered and primarily confirm the resumption of operations with no material impact.

Continue reading the full GT Alert.

  1. This number excludes amended filings. ↩︎
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jena M. Valdetero Jena M. Valdetero

Jena M. Valdetero serves as Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, and is a trusted advisor to clients facing complex and high-stakes data privacy and security challenges. With a track record of leading thousands of data breach investigations for…

Jena M. Valdetero serves as Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, and is a trusted advisor to clients facing complex and high-stakes data privacy and security challenges. With a track record of leading thousands of data breach investigations for more than 20 years, Jena combines her broad litigation experience with a deep understanding of the evolving privacy landscape to protect her clients’ interests. She is highly skilled in defending companies in privacy and data breach litigation, particularly class actions, and is proactive in helping clients prepare for incidents by designing and facilitating customized tabletop exercises.

Jena offers practical, results-driven counsel on data privacy and security compliance programs and guides clients through privacy and cyber risk considerations in mergers, acquisitions, venture capital, and securities transactions. Her experience spans a wide range of privacy laws, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), the Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA), and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Certified as a privacy professional through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (CIPP/US),  Jena provides clients with actionable insights on both current and emerging privacy regulations. She previously served as KnowledgeNet Co-Chair for the International Association of Privacy Professionals, further reflecting her leadership in the field. Jena is a founding board member of the Chicago Compassion Project, a nonprofit supporting low-income families in Chicago.

Jena has been recognized by Chambers USA as a leading privacy and data security lawyer, with clients praising her “very deep knowledge of subject matter” and calling her “extremely responsive and business-minded.” She is trusted for her “great strategic advice” and practical approach to complex data privacy issues, with one client saying, “I’d unequivocally recommend her to anybody with any kind of privacy or data breach concerns.”

Photo of Wouter van Wengen Wouter van Wengen

Wouter van Wengen is a member of the corporate practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Amsterdam office. He focuses his practice on intellectual property law, IT contracts and data protection lawHe represents national and international clients in the creative sector, the technology industry…

Wouter van Wengen is a member of the corporate practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Amsterdam office. He focuses his practice on intellectual property law, IT contracts and data protection lawHe represents national and international clients in the creative sector, the technology industry, and a variety of other companies.

Wouter holds an LL.M. degree in information law at the University of Amsterdam, and an LL.M. degree in Intellectual Property Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and is a member of the Dutch Bar Association.