Skip to content

The following is part of Greenberg Traurig’s ongoing series analyzing cross-border data transfers in light of the new Standard Contractual Clauses approved by the European Commission in June of 2021.

Visual Summary
Overview of situation.  Company A in the EEA retains Company Z-1 in the US to process personal data.  Company Z-1 intends to transmit the personal data to corporate affiliates in other countries throughout the world that are also not considered to have adequate data protection laws (i.e., Company Z-2 and Company Z-3).  There are two main strategies for how the transfer could be structured.

Option 1

 

  • 1st Transfer: SCC Module 2. The initial cross-border transfer from EEA to the United States could utilize the SCC Module 2 designed for transfers from a controller to a non-EEA processor (First SCC).
  • 2nd and 3rd Transfers: SCC Module 3. Pursuant to Section 8.7 of the First SCC, all subsequent onward transfers to non-adequate jurisdictions must also utilize the SCCs (appropriate module). While these could take the form of two separate documents, they might also take the form of a single intragroup agreement that incorporates the SCC Module 3 (Second SCCs).
  • U.S. Transfer Impact Assessment. Section 14 of the First SCC requires Company A and Company Z-1 to document a transfer impact assessment of the laws of the United States to determine whether either party has reason to believe that U.S. laws and practices prevent Company Z-1 from fulfilling its obligations under the SCCs.
  • Other Transfer Impact Assessments. Section 14 of the Second SCCs require Companies Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3 to create a transfer impact assessment of the laws in which Companies Z-2 and Z-3 operate. It is unclear whether Company A must participate in this process.
  • Law enforcement request policy. Section 15 of the SCCs require the data importers (Companies Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3) to take specific steps in the event that they receive a request from a public authority for access to personal data.

Option 2

  • 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Transfer: SCC Module 2.  The parties could enter into a single SCC Module 2 designed for transfers from a controller to a non-EEA processor, which would list Company Z-1, Company Z-2, and Company Z-3 each as separate data importers (First SCC).
  • Transfer Impact Assessments.  Section 14 of the First SCC would require Company A to document a transfer impact assessment with each of the data importers (Company Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3) with regard to their respective countries to determine whether Company A, or whether each of the respective importers, has a reason to believe that the laws of their respective jurisdictions would prevent them from fulfilling their obligations under the First SCC.
  • Law enforcement request policy.  Section 15 of the First SCC requires the data importers (Companies Z-1, Z-2, and Z-3) to take specific steps in the event that they receive a request from a public authority for access to personal data.

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of David A. Zetoony David A. Zetoony

David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, focuses on helping businesses navigate data privacy and cyber security laws from a practical standpoint. David has helped hundreds of companies establish and maintain ongoing privacy and security programs, and he

David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, focuses on helping businesses navigate data privacy and cyber security laws from a practical standpoint. David has helped hundreds of companies establish and maintain ongoing privacy and security programs, and he has defended corporate privacy and security practices in investigations initiated by the Federal Trade Commission, and other data privacy and security regulatory agencies around the world, as well as in class action litigation.

Photo of Carsten A. Kociok Carsten A. Kociok

Carsten Kociok is a partner in the Technology, Financial Services and Data Privacy Practice in Berlin and Co-Head of Greenberg Traurig’s global Fintech Group. He advises national and international clients across all industries, including financial services, information technology, artificial intelligence, ecommerce, media, health

Carsten Kociok is a partner in the Technology, Financial Services and Data Privacy Practice in Berlin and Co-Head of Greenberg Traurig’s global Fintech Group. He advises national and international clients across all industries, including financial services, information technology, artificial intelligence, ecommerce, media, health care, telecoms, retail and real estate, on a wide variety of complex commercial and regulatory matters.

Carsten is a leading technology lawyer, ranked consistently in Band 1 for Fintech Legal in Germany since 2020. He has in-depth and wide-ranging experience in the areas of privacy and cybersecurity, payments law, financial services, e-money products, blockchain technology, and financial and banking regulation, as well as in artificial intelligence regulation – including compliance with the EU AI Act – and the integration of AI technologies into existing software systems.

Carsten regularly assists clients in licensing projects and audit proceedings with financial regulators and advises on the contractual and regulatory aspects of developing, implementing and operating financial technology products and transactions.

On the data privacy side, Carsten counsels clients on complex data-driven business models and regulatory matters, including on international data transfers, data privacy compliance, monetization of data, artificial intelligence, litigation, cybersecurity and data breach response.

Carsten regularly lectures and publishes on various FinTech and data privacy topics. Prior to joining the firm, Carsten worked at Olswang Germany for eight years and in the Capital Transaction Practice Group of an international law firm in New York.

Photo of Andrea C. Maciejewski Andrea C. Maciejewski

Andrea C. Maciejewski designs and implements privacy and security programs for clients of all sizes – from Fortune 500s to start ups – and in all sectors, including digital entertainment, marketing, online education, retail, and consumer goods. Andrea helps companies navigate the intricacies

Andrea C. Maciejewski designs and implements privacy and security programs for clients of all sizes – from Fortune 500s to start ups – and in all sectors, including digital entertainment, marketing, online education, retail, and consumer goods. Andrea helps companies navigate the intricacies of multi-jurisdictional compliance programs as well as compliance with sector-specific data privacy and security laws. Andrea offers clients practical legal counsel, striving to understand the underlying business model and provide strategies that manage costs and risks, while attempting to maintain the businesses operations.

Her practice includes international data privacy laws and regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and China’s Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”), as well as U.S. federal and state data privacy laws, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”), the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), and the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). Some of the specialized documents Andrea drafts include data processing addendums, intracompany agreements, cross-border transfer mechanisms, privacy policies, privacy impact assessments, and data inventories. She has experience in U.S. and multi-national record retention practices, and frequently counsels on updating those practices for compliance with new privacy laws.

Additionally, Andrea provides expert counsel on data concerns unique to video games, eSports, and mobile gaming.