Skip to content

No.

Modern state privacy statutes in the United States (set to go into effect in 2023) and European privacy regulations adopt a similar definition of “profiling,” which occurs when three elements are met:

  1. An activity must involve “an automated form of processing;”
  2. An activity must be “carried out on personal data;”
  3. The objective of the activity must be “to evaluate personal aspects about a natural person.”1

As indicated above, profiling occurs when an organization is attempting to evaluate personal aspects about a data subject. Profiling does not necessarily indicate, however, that an organization takes action based upon the information it has evaluated.

Automated decision making refers to making a decision by technological means without human intervention.2 While automated decision making can rely upon profiling when rendering a decision, it does not necessarily need to do so. For example, if an algorithm is configured to render a decision about an individual’s eligibility to participate in a program open only to individuals over the age of 18 based directly on information an individual provides on a webform (e.g., their date of birth or their age), that activity would constitute “automated decision making,” but it would not necessarily constitute profiling, as the process of making the decision did not evaluate any personal aspects of the person. In contrast, if an algorithm is configured to infer a person’s age by their online behavior and based on the inference render a decision about an individual’s eligibility to participate in a program open only to individuals over the age of 18, that activity would constitute both profiling (i.e., using automated means to evaluate or infer a person’s age) as well as automated decision making (i.e., rendering a decision regarding eligibility based upon the profiling).


1 See, e.g., WP 251, Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679, adopted on 3 October 2017. Cf Va. Code 59.1-571 (2021); C.R.S. 6-1-1303(20) (2021).

2 WP 251, Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679, adopted on 3 October 2017, at 7.

About Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 3,100 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries. Recognized as a 2025 BTI “Best of the Best Recommended Law Firm” by general counsel for trust and relationship management, Greenberg Traurig is consistently ranked among the top firms on the Am Law Global 100, NLJ 500, and Law360 400. Greenberg Traurig is also known for its philanthropic giving, culture, innovation, and pro bono work. Web: www.gtlaw.com.

Law blog design & platform by LexBlog